Thursday, October 10, 2013

FOLLOW-UP UPDATE: U.S. Special Operations Raids Quick in Execution, Years in Coordination

This is an updated version of the previous article I sent.  The only reason I agreed to do the interview was to get something like the statements in print (I said a little more than what is below but I hope the point is made).  The journalist agreed but then the editor dropped them (probably due to word count) but then the journalist to her credit went back to her editor and got them reinserted and the article updated.

Maxwell, who retired from the U.S. Army as a Special Forces colonel, said he has been frustrated to see anonymous government sources reportedly stating the names of the organizations that conducted the operations over the weekend, explaining that providing detailed information about the operations puts service members in those units as well as their family members in danger. While these operations have to be discussed, he said, and it is important for the public to understand that coordination and preparation goes into them, this information should not come out at the expense of military capability and service member safety.

“If I were king for a day, I would attribute these operations to U.S. military forces and I would leave it at that,” he said, explaining that in the case of the Somalia mission, discussion of rules of engagement and the way U.S. forces withdrew because of the high number of civilians “feeds the enemy for their future operations and discussions of specific tactics techniques and procedures.”*


U.S. Special Operations Raids Quick in Execution, Years in Coordination

By Catherine Cheney, on 09 Oct 2013Trend Lines

Over the weekend, members of special mission units under the U.S. Joint Special Operations Command carried out raids in Somalia and Libya, capturing a senior al-Qaida operative in the latter country.

While these attacks often come across as lightning strikes in the media, no detail is spared in terms of coordination and preparation. Trend Lines spoke with three experts about the disconnect between how these operations appear versus how they operate.

“The events this weekend were both significant and insignificant,” David Maxwell, associate director of the Center for Security Studies and the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University, told Trend Lines. On one hand, he said, the capture in Libya of Nazih Abdul-Hamed al-Ruqai, also known as Abu Anas al-Libi, who has long been sought in connection with the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, was an important accomplishment on its own terms.

On the other hand, the nature of the operation was not a surprise; special operations forces have routinely carried out complex, coordinated raids like this one, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan. “The U.S. possesses the capability to go where they need to go with military forces to achieve the effects our leadership wants to see achieved,” he said.

This includes the capability to conduct near-simultaneous operations thousands of miles apart from one another, which Maxwell said has become a matter of routine for the U.S. military in the so-called war on terror in terms of planning, rehearsing and execution.

In addition, Maxwell explained that the weekend raids demonstrate the increasing emphasis on interagency trust and coordination among the military, the CIA, the FBI and other organizations that has emerged only over the past decade, and that did not materialize right away even after 9/11.

“We shouldn’t look at any of these operations as purely special operations,” he said, explaining that the U.S. military presence around the world provides troops with “the agility and flexibility to be able to conduct these types of operations.”

Michael O’Hanlon, senior fellow with the Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence and director of research for the Foreign Policy Program at the Brookings Institution, explained in an email interview that the hardest part of preparing for special operations is developing the intelligence.

“One must literally create elaborate charts showing relationships of different people to each other to understand the importance of each, as well as ideas on how to get information on them, and then you must be patient and lucky with all the tools of intelligence at your fingertips,” he said.

Intelligence assets, possibly including people on the ground to provide information while an operation is ongoing, must be in place before an operation like this weekend’s raids can even begin, O’Hanlon said.

Heather Hurlburt, executive director of the National Security Network, noted that other needed assets include surveillance capabilities, whether drones or satellites; as well as a base or ship from which the raid can be launched, reinforcements, rescue teams and equipment; and a place to go after the raid to care for the injured.

It is easiest to conduct these operations from the ocean, she said, explaining that urban environments are more difficult.

She added that the special operations teams go through years of training to prepare physically and mentally for these kinds of missions, including language and weapons training, learning about the target and location and practicing how to work together.

Other prerequisites for success are coordination with U.S. allies and partners, as well as policy guidance and legal clearance.

Over the past 12 years, it has become routine for government actors, such as embassy officials around the world, to assist in coordination, and that provides the military the best opportunities for access, said Maxwell.
(Continued at the link below)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Giving in 2017

Dear Friends,  I do not normally do this (except I did this last year too) and I certainly do not mean to use my news service for solicitat...