DOD watchdog lists top 10 challenges for 2017

A fascinating list from the IG.  Not everything on the list is what I would expect from the IG but I am glad to see eevrything on the list.  The 130 page report can be downloaded here: http://www.dodig.mil/IGInformation/archives/2017_Oversight%20Plan_Final_Signed_508.pdf

Here is the summary of the "Management Challenges" (which I find an interesting way to phrase these).

1.    Countering Global Strategic Challenges

a.    Global Threats From China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea

b.    Interagency cooperation

2.    Countering Terrorist Treat

a.    Developing Security Forces

b.    Insider Threats

3.    Enabling Effective Acquisition and Contract Management

a.    Linking requirements to military plans

b.    Contract management oversight

c.    Illegal Technical Transfer

4.    Increasing Cyber Security and Cyber Capabilities

a.    Offensive and Defense Operations

b.    Technology Platforms/Infrastructure

5.    Improving Financial Management

a.    Financial auditability

b.    Eliminating improper payment

6.    Protecting Key Defense Infrastructure

a.    Installations, Energy, Environment

b.    Space

c.    Defense Industrial and Technology Base

7.    Developing Full Spectrum Total Force Capabilities

a.    Posture and Structure of the force/Building a diverse force despite Capabilities Despite Budget Pressures

b.    Chemical, Biological, Nuclear, Radiological, and Explosive Issues

8.    Building and Maintaining Force Readiness

a. Equipment Accountability and Reset

b. Suicide Prevention

c. Healthcare – Cost, Fraud, Access to Care

d. Talent Management, Force of the Future

9.    Ensuring Ethical

a.    Accountability, Integrity, Whistleblower Issues

b.    Sexual Assault Prevention and Response

10.    Promoting Continuity and Effective Transition Management

c.     Leadership Changes

d.    Planning and Internal Controls

efense

DOD watchdog lists top 10 challenges for 2017

https://fcw.com/articles/2016/12/20/dod-oig-top-10.aspx

• By Sean D. Carberry
• Dec 20, 2016

 

The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General has released its 2017 Oversight Plan that outlines 10 areas of focus, including cyber.

"Increasing Cyber Security and Cyber Capabilities" is one of the DOD's performance and management challenges the watchdog will audit in 2017, along with other areas such as acquisition, countering the terrorist threat and force readiness.

"The DOD OIG identified these challenges based on our oversight work, research, and judgment; oversight work done by other components within the DOD; input from DOD leaders; and oversight projects by the Government Accountability Office," the report states. "While we solicited input from the DOD, we identified these challenges independently."

"The DOD continues to face significant challenges in protecting and securing its networks, systems, and infrastructure from cyber threats and in increasing its overall cyber capabilities," according to OIG, despite some strategic progress from Cyber Command.

The report reiterates what top Pentagon officials have been saying throughout 2016:  cyber threats to the DOD continue to increase, and nation states such as Russia, China, Iran and North Korea are investing heavily in "sophisticated campaigns to penetrate and compromise DOD's networks."

Last week, the DOD OIG released a summary report of 21 audits conducted between Aug. 1, 2015, and Jul. 31, 2016. That report made 61 specific recommendations the DOD needs to take to improve cybersecurity. Those recommendations were added to 138 outstanding items from previous audits.

The coming year will bring more than 12 tech-related audits covering the defense of DOD networks, developing cyber capabilities and infrastructure, cyber offensive and defensive operations, and building and retaining the cyber workforce.

The audits will drill down on specific topics such as implementation of the Joint Information Environment, physical access controls, security controls over contractor systems, insider threat programs and cyber threat indicator sharing.

The Oversight Plan states that DOD continues to face challenges "in developing or acquiring unique cyber capabilities to conduct defensive and offensive operations."

The report also says that DOD does not have "an effective cloud computing implementation strategy or process to collect data and measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the DOD cloud initiative."

The DOD did not have any comment on the OIG Oversight Plan.

About the Author

Sean Carberry is an FCW staff writer covering defense, cybersecurity and intelligence. Prior to joining FCW, he was Kabul Correspondent for NPR, and also served as an international producer for NPR covering the war in Libya and the Arab Spring. He has reported from more than two-dozen countries including Iraq, Yemen, DRC, and South Sudan. In addition to numerous public radio programs, he has reported for Reuters, PBS NewsHour, The Diplomat, and The Atlantic.

Carberry earned a Master of Public Administration from the Harvard Kennedy School, and has a B.A. in Urban Studies from Lehigh University.

What you need to know about the Pentagon's new spy service

A commentary with objections to the new DIA initiative reported this weekend by the Washington Post.  This is certainly an interesting excerpt describing the "interagency:"

Others suspect that the DCS is a backdoor way to circumvent something called the "interagency," which is the hyper-political, informal presidentially-directed policy process for deciding what to spend money on and how to do it. This is, I think, exactly one reason why the DCS appeals to a lot of people who study the idea: The National Security Council has been (historically) very bad at strategy, which means that military and intelligence priorities are often determined in increments driven by the political calendar. An internal structural reorientation allows the Defense Department some "give" to develop better long-term strategies … strategies that civilians simply don't have the political mindspace for. Note how quickly the undersecretaries for policy or directors of intelligence agencies turn over. Continuity is lacking.

Somehow I do not think that this initiative is going to be an "internal structural reorientation" that will will DOD 'to develop better long term strategies."

V/R

Dave

What you need to know about the Pentagon's new

 spy service

DECEMBER 2, 2012, AT 7:24 PM

http://theweek.com/article/index/237208/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-pentagons-new-spy-service

What should a war-weary public think of a whole new spy service for the Pentagon? The brain-child of two wunderkinds of intelligence, the Defense Clandestine Service will ultimately field 1,600 personnel across the world. This sounds like a lot of new spooks. But the reality is a bit different. There is a primer of sorts of what this new spy service will do, and what it won't do.

(1) There won't really ne 1,600 new spies. There are already about 600 or so Defense Attaches attached to embassies and consulates. They collect intelligence openly. They will now work more closely with their covert counterparts and are included in the figure that Congress has been given for the size of the DCS. Of the remaining 1,000 personnel, a bunch will come from existing Department of Defense intelligence collection agencies. DCS will incorporate some of the human intelligence gatherers of the Army Compartmented Element, which works primarily with the Special Operations Command, and the Defense Program Support Activity, which creates secret task forces to deal with the toughest and most highly sensitive defense-related intelligence problems. It will swallow whole the Defense Intelligence Agency's existing Defense Counterintelligence and Human Service. This brings the total of "new" spies to several hundred. They will be trained and fielded over the course over five years. 

(Continued at the link below)

http://theweek.com/article/index/237208/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-pentagons-new-spy-service