Showing posts with label Special Operations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Special Operations. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

Special Warfare Magazine - Special Operations In the Pacific

For those with an interest in SOF in the Asia-Pacific Region the latest edition of Special Warfare Magazine from the US Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School has about 90+ pages of articles.



ARTICLES 
06 | SOCPAC Overview and Map 
08 | In Depth: SOCPAC Commander 
11 | Asia Threat Overview 
15 | Remaining First in Asia 
20 | Tailoring Logistics Support 

22 | SECTION: NEPAL 
22 Nepal Overview 
31 Maiti Nepal 
32 SOF Mountaineering and Training 
34 Mahabir Rangers 
40 Left of Zero: SOF Crisis Response 

44 | SECTION: SRI LANKA 
44 Sri Lanka Overview 
54 Crisis Response: Floods and Landslides 
56 Flood Response 
58 | Photostory: India 

60 | SECTION: PHILIPPINES 
60 Operation Enduring Freedom 
62 Sustaining Partnerships 
64 Processing, Exploitation and Dissemination 
66 The Philippine Primer 

72 | Narrative Fusion Cell 
74 | Republic of Korea: Engagements that Last 

76 | SECTION: THAILAND 
76 Photostory: Thailand 
78 SOF Roots in Thailand 
80 Cobra Gold 2017 

83 | Japan: Permanent Partners in the Pacific Rim 

84 | Effectiveness of a Forward-stationed Special Forces Battalion 

86 | Mongolian SOF 

88 | Photostory: Singapore 

90 | Maritime FID in Bangladesh

Friday, December 9, 2016

PRISM Volume 6, No 3: Special Operations in a Chaotic World

This is the most comprehensive SOF publication produced by NDU in recent years to my knowledge.  I have pasted the table of contents below.  I have not gone through every article but the list of authors indicate that this edition of Prism will provide some very important and comprehensive views on Special Operations.  Many of these articles will likely be added to my syllabus for my course on UW and SOF for Policymakers and Strategists.

The PDF can be downloaded here  http://cco.ndu.edu/Portals/96/Documents/prism/prism_6-3/Prologue.pdf?ver=2016-12-06-101058-623 and each article can be individually accessed from the table of contents at this link: http://cco.ndu.edu/PRISM-6-3/

Thank you to Dr. Joe Collins for leading this effort as the Director of the Center for Complex Contingency Operations (CCO)

PRISM Volume 6, No 3

Prologue

By General Raymond Thomas III | PRISM Volume 6, Number 3 | December 07, 2016

As the commander of United States Special Operations Command (SOCOM), I welcome you to an issue of PRISMdedicated to special operations. SOCOM is responsible for the critical dual missions of providing the U.S. Geographic Commands with trained and ready special operations forces (SOF), as well as synchronizing their actions—we are uniquely created by law to perform both service-like activities and serve as a functional Geographic Combatant Command. In addition, SOCOM serves as the coordinating authority for the Department of Defense National Military Strategic Plan to Counter Trans-Regional Terrorist Organization (NMSP-CTTO). In light of the complexity of today’s security environment, SOF are spread broadly across the spectrum of conflict. As a SOF enterprise we continually strive to be ready, and I am confident we are postured to address today’s trans-regional challenges by virtue of our global perspective and authorities. Nevertheless, we must push ourselves to transform to meet evolving challenges, which entails leveraging developmental technologies and critically revisiting our structures and processes, while at the same time adjusting our tactics, techniques, and procedures to enhance effectiveness.
In just the past few years we have witnessed a varied and evolving threat environment consisting of: the emergence of a militarily expansionist China; an increasingly unpredictable North Korea; a revanchist Russia threatening our interests in both Europe and Asia; and an Iran which continues to expand its influence across the Middle East, fueling the Sunni-Shia conflict. All four of these state actors utilize forms of hybrid conflict short of war that frustrate and limit traditional forms of deterrence. Nonstate actors further confuse this landscape by employing terrorist, criminal, and insurgent networks that erode governance in all but the strongest states placing weak and fragile states fighting ethnic or religious insurgencies at risk of failure or collapse. Perhaps the best way to describe today's environment is "predictably unpredictable." Special operations forces provide asymmetric capability and responses to these challenges. Operating across the range of military operations, SOF are prepared to meet these challenges through discrete activities ranging from Direct Action, Special Reconnaissance, Counter-terrorism, Hostage Rescue/Recovery, and Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction, to more enduringv engagements such as Unconventional Warfare, Foreign Internal Defense, Security Force Assistance, Counterinsurgency, Foreign Humanitarian Assistance, Military Information Support or Civil Affairs Operations. Regardless of the ways in which we confront these adversities, our SOF must be innovative, adaptive, and dedicated to seeking information dominance that increases our effectiveness.
This PRISM issue offers many articles that provoke thought and provide a basis for dialog on topics of interest to SOF, and hopefully, everyone committed to U.S. national security. As you read this issue, it is worth highlighting that nearly 8,000 SOF are continuously deployed in over 90 countries around the globe conducting the full range of SOF missions, and providing Geographic Combatant Commands with special operations capability and expertise required to support their operations in an increasingly complex security environment. Use the ideas and discourse of this PRISM issue to expand your understanding of SOF and the role they can play in our national defense.
– General Raymond Anthony Thomas III, Commander U.S. Special Operations Command


Features

Interview




Wednesday, October 28, 2015

U.S. weighs special forces in Syria, helicopters in Iraq

Dear Administration officials,

If there is an indigenous solution or if indigenous capabilities contribute to a solution then a proper part of the strategy is unconventional warfare based on our special warfare capabilities (though that ship probably sailed some years ago due to administration risk averseness and ignorance).   But I hope your new "3 R's" "strategy" based on counter-terrorism capabilities as applied to a civil war works out for us - at least it will look like we are doing something.  And at least we will be able to pound a lot of nails with our hammer.  We cannot apply our capabilities as either/or. It has to be both/and.  We need our surgical strike capabilities along with special warfare and they will be better employed if they rest on the long term actions of special warfare.  There is a yin yang relationship but our default to one over the other is not the way for SOF to support national strategy and campaign plans.

Very respectfully,

A concerned citizen

Excerpt.

Two U.S. officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing deliberations, said any deployments would be narrowly tailored, seeking to advance specific, limited military objectives in both Iraq and Syria.
That option includes temporarily deploying some U.S. special operations forces inside of Syria to advise moderate Syrian opposition fighters for the first time and, potentially, to help call in U.S. air strikes, one official said.

U.S. weighs special forces in Syria, helicopters in Iraq

WASHINGTON The United States is considering sending a small number of special operations forces to Syria and attack helicopters to Iraq as it weighs options to build momentum in the battle against Islamic State, U.S. officials said on Tuesday.

  • by Phil Stewart And Jeff Mason 
  •  Oct. 28, 2015 
  •  2 min read 
  •  original
WASHINGTON The United States is considering sending a small number of special operations forces to Syria and attack helicopters to Iraq as it weighs options to build momentum in the battle against Islamic State, U.S. officials said on Tuesday.
President Barack Obama, deeply averse to over-committing American troops to unpopular wars in the Middle East, could view some of the options as more viable than others as he approaches the final stretch of his presidency.
Still, Obama's administration is under pressure to ramp up America's effort, particularly after the fall of the Iraqi city of Ramadi to Islamic State in May and the failure of a U.S. military program to train and arm thousands of Syrian rebels.
Two U.S. officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing deliberations, said any deployments would be narrowly tailored, seeking to advance specific, limited military objectives in both Iraq and Syria.
That option includes temporarily deploying some U.S. special operations forces inside of Syria to advise moderate Syrian opposition fighters for the first time and, potentially, to help call in U.S. air strikes, one official said.
Other possibilities including sending a small number of Apache attack helicopters, and U.S. forces to operate them, to Iraq, as well as taking steps to bolster other Iraqi capabilities needed to claw back territory from Islamic State.
The deliberations come as the United States looks to Syrian opposition fighters it supports to put pressure on Raqqa, the Islamic State's stronghold, and for Iraqi forces to retake Ramadi after the city fell to the militants earlier this year.
The options appeared to stop short of deploying American troops in any direct ground combat roles, something Obama has so far ruled out.
One of the officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said the proposals were still in a conceptual stage - meaning that even if any were approved in the coming days, a U.S. military deployment could still be weeks or months away.
The Pentagon and White House declined comment on the options, which were also reported by the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal.
Earlier on Tuesday, U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter signaled his intent to step up the U.S. military's activity in Iraq and Syria, just days after U.S. forces participated in a raid to rescue Islamic State hostages in Iraq.
One U.S. soldier was killed in that mission.
"We won't hold back from supporting capable partners in opportunistic attacks against ISIL or conducting such missions directly, whether by strikes from the air or direct action on the ground," Carter told a Senate hearing, using an acronym for the militant group.
Marine Corp General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate hearing he would consider recommending putting more U.S. forces with Iraqi troops to support the Islamic State fight if it improved chances of defeating the militants.
"If it had operational or strategic impact and we could reinforce success, that would be the basic framework within which I'd make a recommendation for additional forces to be co-located with Iraqi units," Dunford said, without elaborating.
(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

Giving Tuesday Recommendations

  Dear Friends,  I do not normally do this (except I did this last year and for the last few years now, too) and I certainly do not mean to ...